Home page Documentation  

Home » Documentation » iPedia Frequently Asked Questions

Table of contents

  1. What is the source of articles used in iPedia?
  2. Why iPedia article is different than corresponding WikiPedia article?
  3. Why iPedia article count is different than WikiPedia article count?
  4. Why there is an error in an article?
  5. How can I tell ArsLexis about features I would like to see in iPedia?
  6. I have a problem with iPedia. What do I do?
  7. I have a question that is not answered here.

What is the source of articles used in iPedia?

iPedia uses articles from WikiPedia project. WikiPedia is a collaboratively edited encyclopedia. The project started in 2001 and has been growing at an amazing pace. In only 3 years WikiPedia grew to more than 600 thousand articles (for comparison, Encyclopedia Britannica claims to offer about 120 thousand articles) and the growth doesn't seem to be stopping. Just imagine how many articles we'll have 10 years from now!

Why iPedia article is different than corresponding WikiPedia article?

There are two reasons why this might happen.

First, we use cached copy of WikiPedia articles. Since WikiPedia is growing so quickly, an article might have been modified since the last time we cached it. We try to update our copy at least once a month.

Second, due to Palm OS limitations, we might not be able to display the whole article. We're working on improving things, but currently, for example, we don't display pictures, tables, some characters (e.g. Japanese).

Why iPedia article count is different than WikiPedia article count?

There are two reasons why this might happen.

First, our content is a copy of WikiPedia data. Second, counting articles is an inexact science and our algorithm might be slightly different than the one used by WikiPedia.

In any case, the difference is small.

Why there is an error in an article?

ArsLexis doesn't control the content of articles. iPedia uses articles from WikiPedia project. The great thing about WikiPedia is that anyone can contribute to an article. Thanks to that, the greatest minds on the plan might contribute to the project. The not-so-great think about WikiPedia is that anyone can contribute to an article, even those less knowledgeable. There are also cases of vandalism (usually quickly repaired). Due to that fact some question the validity of WikiPedia as a source information.

We believe that it's an extraordinary source of information, but don't take our word for granted! Use iPedia (a risk-free proposition since we provide trial version that allows limited number of lookups and unlimited number of random article lookups) and find out for yourself if the quality of articles is up to your standard.

How can I tell ArsLexis about features I would like to see in iPedia?

We worked hard to make iPedia the best it could be. But we can't think of everything. If you have a suggestion on how we can improve iPedia to better serve your needs, we would love to hear it. Please join our discussion group and post your ideas there or send them via e-mail. Tell us what features are most important to you. We do value your feedback.

I have a problem with iPedia. What do I do?

We're always happy to provide support for our products. Our support page lists all support options provided by ArsLexis. Don't hesitate to contact us in case of problems.

I have a question that is not answered here.

Post it in our discussion groups. We'll post a response there and if we think that a question might be of interest to others, we'll add it here as well.